![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
David S. Miller wrote: > From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> > Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:26:03 +0200 > >>OK, updated patch attached. The TTL is now always kept up-to-date. > > > Looks nice. > > Is there any reasonable reason to allow ip_pkt_list_tot to ever be > larger than say 255? If we can accept that limit, we can shrink > the recent_entry considerably by packing the index and nstamps > into a single word next to ttl. My primary goal was full compatibility, I have no idea about real-life usage though. Maybe Stephen can answer this. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-17 09:21 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||