![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
David S. Miller wrote: > From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> > Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:26:03 +0200 > > >>+ if (info->check_set & (IPT_RECENT_SET | IPT_RECENT_REMOVE) && >>+ (info->seconds || info->hit_count)) >>+ return 0; > > > I'm feeling particularly dense today... but what is the relative > precedence of '&' vs '&&'? > > I've been told that if you have to look up C operator precedence, > don't bother and add parenthesis instead :) Bitwise AND has precedence, but I have no problems adding an extra set of parenthesis around it :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-17 09:21 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||