![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
David> I'm feeling particularly dense today... but what is the
David> relative precedence of '&' vs '&&'?
& binds tighter than &&. "man operator" can be your friend...
David> I've been told that if you have to look up C operator
David> precedence, don't bother and add parenthesis instead :) -
Probably a good rule though.
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-17 09:16 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||