Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Regression seen for patch "sched:dont decrease idle sleep avg" | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Sat, 13 May 2006 15:07:17 +0200 |
| |
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 05:27 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > (Catching up on lkml) > > On Thu, 11 May 2006 17:04:11 -0700 > "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com> wrote: > > > Tim Chen writes: > > > See patch: > > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e72ff0bb2c163eb13014ba113701bd42dab382fe > > > > Con Kolivas wrote on Monday, May 08, 2006 5:43 PM > > > This patch corrects a bug in the original code which unintentionally dropped > > > the priority of tasks that were idle but were already high priority on other > > > merits. It doesn't further increase the priority. > > > > > > This got me to take a non-casual look at that particular git commit. The > > first portion of the change log description says perfectly about the intent, > > but after studying the code, I have to say that the actual code does not > > implement what people say it will do. In recalc_task_prio(), if a task's > > sleep_time is more than INTERACTIVE_SLEEP, it will bump up p->sleep_avg all > > the way to near maximum (at MAX_SLEEP_AVG - DEF_TIMESLICE), which according > > to my calculation, it will have a priority bonus of 4 (out of max 5). > > > > IOW, for a prolonged sleep, a task will immediately get near maximum priority > > boost. Is that what the real intent is? Seems to be on the contrary to what > > the source code comments as well. > > > > I think in the if (sleep_time > INTERACTIVE_SLEEP) block, p->sleep_avg should > > be treated similarly like what the "else" block is doing: scale it proportionally > > with past sleep time, perhaps not the immediate previously prolonged sleep > > because that would for sure bump up priority too fast. A better method might > > be p->sleep_avg *= 2 or something like that. > > > > That seems to be a pretty significant discovery. Is anything happening > with it?
When I tried to fix that, I ran into resistance.
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |