![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 09:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Sébastien Dugué <sebastien.dugue@bull.net> wrote: > >> > > > > > In futex_requeue(), when the 2 futexes keys hash to the same bucket, there > > is no need to move the futex_q to the end of the bucket list. > > > > ... > > > For some reason I get a reject when applying this. Which is odd, because I > see no differences in there. Oh well - please try to work out what went > wrong and double-check that the patch which I applied still makes sense. Yep, it's due to the futex_hash_bucket renaming from ->bh to ->hb that went into pi-futex-futex-code-cleanups.patch from the PI-futex patchset - no harm. Sébastien. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-12 10:08 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||