[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
    On Wednesday 10 May 2006 17:37, Daniel Walker wrote:
    > On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 17:21 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
    > > Don't. Fix. Correct. Code.
    > >
    > > Ever. Because sooner or later you will paper over real bug. It's far
    > > better to reject patches that just make $TOOL to STFU than risk blind
    > > "fix" hiding a real bug.
    > Couldn't agree with you more .. But I don't want to see the warning
    > either ..

    Maybe adding "#warning GCC false-positive in this file, line blah." would be a
    suitable compromise. "Seeing" the bug isn't that big a deal, it's opening the
    file up to investigate it only to find it's been investigated a million times
    before and the same conclusions drawn..


    Third year Computer Science undergraduate.
    1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-05-10 21:57    [W:0.028 / U:54.300 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site