[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 17:37, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 17:21 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > Don't. Fix. Correct. Code.
> >
> > Ever. Because sooner or later you will paper over real bug. It's far
> > better to reject patches that just make $TOOL to STFU than risk blind
> > "fix" hiding a real bug.
> Couldn't agree with you more .. But I don't want to see the warning
> either ..

Maybe adding "#warning GCC false-positive in this file, line blah." would be a
suitable compromise. "Seeing" the bug isn't that big a deal, it's opening the
file up to investigate it only to find it's been investigated a million times
before and the same conclusions drawn..


Third year Computer Science undergraduate.
1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-10 21:57    [W:0.092 / U:3.672 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site