lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 8/8] Add abilty to enable/disable nmi watchdog from sysfs
Don,

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:59:53AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> >
> > This means you can at runtime enable/disbale nmi_watchdog, i.e., reserve
> > some performance counters on the fly. This gets complicated because now
> > the perfmon subsystem (and probably oprofile) cannot check register
> > availability when they are first initialized. Basically each time,
> > the /sys entry is modified, they would have to scan the list of available
> > performance counters. I don't know exactly when Oprofile does this checking.
> > For perfmon, this is done only once, when the PMU description table is loaded.

> How often did you plan on enabling/disabling the nmi_watchdog? My
> understanding was you disable nmi_watchdog, run oprofile/perfmon,
> re-enable nmi_watchdog. I guess I don't understand what type of funky
> scenarios you are dealing with.
>
I thought that part of the exercise was to allow oprofile/perfmon and nmi_watchdog
to work simultaneously, i.e., don't disable watchdog when you monitor. Leave watchdog
on and have oprofile/perfmon run with fewer counters. The alternative would be to do
what you say: disbale nmi, monitor, re-enable nmi.

> >
> > Also something that I did not see in this code is the error detection in
> > case enable_lapic_nmi_watchdog() fails. Oprofile runs on all CPUs or none.
> > Perfmon lets you monitor on subsets on CPUs. In case NMI was disabled and
> > a monitoring session was active on some CPUs. The enable_lapic_nmi_watchdog()
> > will fail on some CPUs. How is that handled?
>
> It's not. In fact I wouldn't know what to do in such situations. Is it
> really wrong to only have a subset of cpus being monitored by the
> nmi_watchdog? This seems to be wandering into the area where the user is
> looking to do something complicated (profiling a subset of cpus) and as
> such might be expected to make sure the nmi_watchdog is properly enabled
> on all cpus when they are done.
>
On larger machines (think NUMA-style), it does not always make sense to monitor all CPUs.

--

-Stephane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-10 17:12    [W:0.121 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site