[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 11/13] cell: split out board specific files
> Segher, a problem with your suggestion is that our
> makefiles don't have as rich a set of logical ops as the
> config files. Its easy to express 'build A if B', but not
> so easy to do 'build A if not C'. To make this work
> cleanly I made PPC_CELL denote !SOME_HYPERVISOR_THING,
> so I can have constructions like this in the makefile:

Not just that, but we can have a kernel image supporting both
the "raw" hardware _and_ stuff with a hypervisor underneath.

All CONFIG_<whatever> should always be used as a positive,
never a negative. My bad :-)

So it really should be

depends on PPC_CELL_NATIVE

or similar. Having PPC_CELL mean "native" / "raw" is not the
way to go, there will be many many hypervisors in the future,
it would be nice to have PPC_CELL mean just that, "support for
the Cell architecture" in general, kernels running on various
hypervisors will see the hardware virtualised to varying degrees.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-02 01:12    [W:0.091 / U:31.108 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site