![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com> wrote: > My last mail specifically addresses preempt-rt, but I'd like to know > people's thoughts regarding this issue in the mainline kernel. Please > see my previous post "realtime-preempt scheduling - rt_overload > behavior" for a testcase that produces unpredictable scheduling > results. thanks for the testcase! It indeed triggered a bug in the -rt tree's "RT-overload" balancing feature. The nature of the bug made it trigger much less likely on 2-way boxes (where i do most of my -rt testing), probably that's why it didnt get discovered before. I've uploaded the -rt14 tree with this bug fixed - does it fix the failures for you? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-09 13:26 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||