![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > * Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> wrote: > > > I'm quite aware of what you're saying as well as a much of the > > contents of the -rt patch. Please don't assume that I'm not aware of > > this. The -rt patch doesn't do SWSRPS, [...] > > to the contrary, the "RT overload" code in the -rt tree does strict, > system-wide RT priority scheduling. That's the whole point of it. so after this "clarification of terminology" i hope you are in picture now, so could you please explain to me what you meant by: > > You should consider for a moment to allow for the binding of a > > thread to a CPU to determine the behavior of a SCHED_FIFO class task > > instead of creating a new run category. [...] to me it still makes no sense, and much of the followups were based on this. Or were you simply confused about what the scheduling code in -rt does precisely? Did that get clarified now? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-08 07:30 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||