lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: RT task scheduling

* Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> wrote:

> > >>> You should consider for a moment to allow for the binding of a
> > >>> thread to a CPU to determine the behavior of a SCHED_FIFO class task
> > >>> instead of creating a new run category. [...]
> >
> > with the observation that 1) binding is already possible [so your
> > suggestion is apparently knocking on open doors] 2) binding is a
> > separate mechanism (not adequate for all workloads) and it is thus
> > orthogonal to what i'm trying to achieve with the "RT overload" stuff.
> > Really simple and straightforward observations i think.

> First thing's first, SCHED_FIFO_GLOBAL for what you want in the main
> line is the same thing as SCHED_FIFO in -rt, right ?

yes.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-07 13:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans