lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: RT task scheduling

    * Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> wrote:

    > > >>> You should consider for a moment to allow for the binding of a
    > > >>> thread to a CPU to determine the behavior of a SCHED_FIFO class task
    > > >>> instead of creating a new run category. [...]
    > >
    > > with the observation that 1) binding is already possible [so your
    > > suggestion is apparently knocking on open doors] 2) binding is a
    > > separate mechanism (not adequate for all workloads) and it is thus
    > > orthogonal to what i'm trying to achieve with the "RT overload" stuff.
    > > Really simple and straightforward observations i think.

    > First thing's first, SCHED_FIFO_GLOBAL for what you want in the main
    > line is the same thing as SCHED_FIFO in -rt, right ?

    yes.

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-04-07 13:41    [W:0.020 / U:90.364 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site