![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Greg KH wrote: > Because "struct device" generally is not related to a major:minor pair > at all. That is what a struct class_device is for. Lots of struct > device users have nothing to do with a char device, and some have > multiple char devices associated with a single struct device. Well, OK, but AFAIK, your long-term plan is to merge class_device and device, so in the long-term perspective it does not matter. And those who do not need a character device support may have a possibility to disable it. > All that being said, yes, there is a disconnect between the driver model > parts and the char subsystem. It's been something that I've wanted to > fix for a number of years, but never had the time to do so. If you want > to work toward doing this, I'd be glad to review any patches. Will see. At this point my knowledge and understanding is not so deep, so I don't think I'm able to provide decent patches. May be in future. For now I'm only wondering. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityutskiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-05 07:56 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||