![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:41:09 +0200 Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 16:26 +0900, MAEDA Naoaki wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:59:49 +0200 > > Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: > > > You simply cannot ignore interactive tasks. At the very least, you have > > > to disallow requeue if the resource limit has been exceeded, otherwise, > > > this patch set is non-functional. > > > > It can be easily implemented on top of the current code. Do you know a good > > sample program that is judged as interactive but consumes lots of cpu? > > X sometimes, Mozilla sometimes,... KDE konsole when scrolling,... > anything that on average sleeps more than roughly 5% of it's slice can > starve you to death either alone, or (worse) with peers. They are true interactive tasks, aren't they? Oh! I should say "that is not interactive, but judged as interactive and consumes lots of cpu". Thanks, MAEDA Naoaki - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-28 09:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||