![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 09:11 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 09:56 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > > I'm also pretty sure, that CPU controller based on timeslice tricks > > behaves poorly on burstable load patterns as well and with interactive > > tasks. So before commiting I propose to perform a good testing on > > different load patterns.> > Yes, it can only react very slowly. Actually, this might not be that much of a problem. I know I can traverse queue heads periodically very cheaply. Traversing both active and expired arrays to requeue starving tasks once every 100ms costs max 4usecs (3GHz P4) for a typical distribution. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-28 09:47 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||