lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [uml-devel] [RFC] PATCH 3/4 - Time virtualization : PTRACE_SYSCALL_MASK
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:28:46PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Ok, this gives us a definite proposal, which I finally like:
>
> * to exclude sys_tee:
>
> bitmask = 0;
> set_bit(__NR_tee, bitmask);
> ptrace(PTRACE_SET_NOTRACE, bitmask);
>
> * to trace only sys_tee:
>
> bitmask = 0;
> set_bit(__NR_tee, bitmask);
> ptrace(PTRACE_SET_TRACEONLY, bitmask);

Yup, I like this.

> the call fails if any of them is 1, and in the failure case E2BIG or
> EOVERFLOW is returned

strerror(E2BIG) is "Arg list too long"

strerror(EOVERFLOW) is "Value too large for defined data type"

Neither of those seems right. I'd just as soon stick with -EINVAL.

Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-29 04:52    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans