![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi Mike, On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:25:35 +0200 Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 10:37 +0900, MAEDA Naoaki wrote: > > Andrew, > > > > This patchset adds a CPU resource controller on top of Resource Groups. > > The CPU resource controller manages CPU resources by scaling timeslice > > allocated for each task without changing the algorithm of the O(1) > > scheduler. > > > > Please consider these for inclusion in -mm tree. > > This patch set professes to be a resource controller, yet 100% of high > priority tasks are uncontrolled. Distribution of CPU among high > priority tasks isn't important, but distribution of what they leave > behind is? Do you mean niced tasks are uncontrolled by the controller? TASK_INTERACTIVEs are left untouched intentionally, but niced tasks are also controlled. Thanks, MAEDA Naoaki - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-28 07:52 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||