Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:40:21 -0400 | From | Vivek Goyal <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 |
| |
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:24:44PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:02:27PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:47:25PM +0200, Matthieu CASTET wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > > > Le Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:41:41 -0700, Andrew Morton a ?crit?: > > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17-rc2/2.6.17-rc2-mm1/ > > > > > > > > > > 64 bit resources core changes in ioport.h break pnp sysfs interface. > > > > > > A patch like this is needed. > > > > > > Matthieu > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@free.fr> > > > > > > --- 1/drivers/pnp/interface.c 2006-01-03 04:21:10.000000000 +0100 > > > +++ 2/drivers/pnp/interface.c 2006-04-14 22:54:45.000000000 +0200 > > > @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ > > > if (pnp_port_flags(dev, i) & IORESOURCE_DISABLED) > > > pnp_printf(buffer," disabled\n"); > > > else > > > - pnp_printf(buffer," 0x%lx-0x%lx\n", > > > + pnp_printf(buffer," 0x%llx-0x%llx\n", > > > pnp_port_start(dev, i), > > > pnp_port_end(dev, i)); > > > > I think it would break on ppc64 as u64 is unsigned long. It should be > > explicitly typecasted to unsigned long long. Same is true for all the > > instances. > > Does ppc64 use the PnP code? >
I had assumed it. Just now did a allmodconfig on ppc64 and came to know there is no such option as CONFIG_PNP. Sorry for the noise.
Thanks Vivek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |