[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Lockless page cache test results
    Jens Axboe wrote:

    > Things look pretty bad for the lockless kernel though, Nick any idea
    > what is going on there? The splice change is pretty simple, see the top
    > three patches here:

    Could just be the use of spin lock instead of read lock.

    I don't think it would be hard to convert find_get_pages_contig
    to be lockless.

    Patched vanilla numbers look nicer, but I'm curious as to why
    __do_page_cache was so bad before, if the file was in cache.
    Presumably it should not more than double tree_lock acquisition...
    it isn't getting called multiple times for each page, is it?

    SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
    Send instant messages to your online friends

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-04-27 10:31    [W:0.021 / U:33.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site