![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 06:15 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thursday 27 April 2006 01:06, Ken Brush wrote: > > > > 2/ What advantages does AppArmor provide over techniques involving > > > virtualisation or gaol mechanisms? Are these advantages worth > > > while? > > I would guess the advantage is easier administration. e.g. I always > found it a PITA to synchronize files like /etc/resolv.conf and similar > files into chroots. there's another option than just chroots; construct a namespace with just the allowed files bind-mounted in. That is 100% scriptable and also doesn't have the "stale files" problem - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-27 08:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||