lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Some Concrete AppArmor Questions - was Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
    From
    Date
    On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 06:15 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > On Thursday 27 April 2006 01:06, Ken Brush wrote:
    >
    > > > 2/ What advantages does AppArmor provide over techniques involving
    > > > virtualisation or gaol mechanisms? Are these advantages worth
    > > > while?
    >
    > I would guess the advantage is easier administration. e.g. I always
    > found it a PITA to synchronize files like /etc/resolv.conf and similar
    > files into chroots.

    there's another option than just chroots; construct a namespace with
    just the allowed files bind-mounted in. That is 100% scriptable and also
    doesn't have the "stale files" problem

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-04-27 08:55    [W:0.024 / U:6.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site