lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 27 Apr 2006 09:28:14 +0300 (EEST)
FromPekka J Enberg <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] likely cleanup: remove unlikely for kfree(NULL)
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Not to dispute your conclusions or method, but I think doing a
> defconfig or your personal config might be more representative
> of % size increase of text that will actually be executed. And
> that is the expensive type of text.

True but I was under the impression that Arjan thought we'd get text 
savings with GCC 4.1 by making kfree() inline.

				Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-27 08:30    [from the cache]
©2003-2008