![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 04/26/2006 22:57, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 06:00:52PM -0500, Roman Kononov wrote: >> Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> - the compilers are slower, and less reliable. This is _less_ of an >>> issue these days than it used to be (at least the reliability part), >>> but it's still true. >> G++ compiling heavy C++ is a bit slower than gcc. The g++ front end is >> reliable enough. Do you have a particular bug in mind? > > Obviously you're not interested in gcc evolutions. I suggest that you > take your browser to http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html#3.4.5 > This is the last version which showed per-subsystem problem reports > before they used SVN. Just count the lines : 9 bugs fixed for C, 45 > for C++. And when you read those bugs, you don't have the feeling of > reading a description of something that people make their code rely on. I am interested very much. And if one really understands the bugs listed, he can say that they are minor for both C and C++. I would certainly recommend rely on g++. Regards, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-27 07:56 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||