![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 06:34:42PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote: > > > > > > CONFIG_LBD and CONFIG_LSF are spread into asm/types.h for no particularly > > > good reason. Centralising the definition in linux/types.h means that arch > > > maintainers don't need to bother adding it, as well as fixing the problem > > > with x86-64 users being asked to make a decision that has absolutely no > > > effect. The H8/300 porters seem particularly confused since I'm not aware > > > of any microcontrollers that need to support 2TB filesystems these days. > > > > x86_64: > > > > include/linux/types.h:137: error: conflicting types for 'sector_t' > > include/asm/types.h:51: error: previous declaration of 'sector_t' was here > > is the conflicting patch available somewhere so i can put a patch in for > it? I don't think there was any conflicting patch. I have no other patches touching include/linux/types.h or include/asm-x86_64/types.h. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-27 07:20 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||