[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: C++ pushback
    On Wed, 2006-04-26 12:25:19 -0700, David Schwartz <> wrote:
    [Variable names that are reserved in C++]
    > And, FWIW, it isn't even necessary to change those names. That is only
    > needed to compile the kernel in C++, which is not what anyone was talking
    > about. Supporting C++ modules, for example, would work fine even if the
    > kernel had variables called 'class' or 'private'. (Though things could be
    > done a lot more cleanly if it didn't as it would require some remapping
    > before and after compilation.)

    There's one _practical_ thing you need to keep in mind: you'll either
    need 'C++'-clean kernel headers (to interface low-level kernel
    functions) or a separate set of headers.

    For separate headers, I see the problem of keeping them synchronized
    with the kernel. The clean-up-kernel-headers-for-userspce-consumption
    guys already took that bullet once and up to now, there's no "real"
    result. (That's while we all know that kernel values *are* somewhat
    for the userspace guys:-) I see an even smaller user-base for
    separate C++ kernel headers (and thus more work per person)--and I
    think that the current in-kernel headers just won't be C++ compatible,

    MfG, JBG
    [*] Famous last words...

    Jan-Benedict Glaw . +49-172-7608481 _ O _
    "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O
    für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O
    ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-04-26 22:04    [W:0.022 / U:84.868 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site