Messages in this thread | | | From | Nick Warne <> | Subject | scheduler question 2.6.16.x | Date | Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:05:18 +0100 |
| |
Hi all,
I see in menuconfig I have two options:
<*> Anticipatory I/O scheduler <*> Deadline I/O scheduler
Help reveals Anticipatory is pretty good, but make a slightly larger kernel - Deadline help says it a good alternative to Anticipatory.
But I can build both in... so I guess then the kernel decides what is the best to use? Or should it be so I am only allowed to select one or the other and allowing both is an oversight?
Thanks,
Nick -- "Person who say it cannot be done should not interrupt person doing it." -Chinese Proverb - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |