Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:16:47 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: C++ pushback |
| |
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:02:27PM -0600, Gary Poppitz wrote: > >We know they are "incompatible", why else would we allow "private" and > >"struct class" in the kernel source if we some how expected it to work > >with a C++ compiler? > > > I can see that this was intentional, not an oversight. > > If there is a childish temper tantrum mentality about C++ then I have > no reason or desire to be on this list.
If there is a lack of willingness to do a simple bit of research: http://www.google.com/search?q=linux+kernel+C%2B%2B The responses you get back might seem a big harsh.
In short, the rule around here, as well with most groups in life, seems to be: "show no respect, get none in return"
thanks,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |