lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: kfree(NULL)
From
Date
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 15:53 -0700, Hua Zhong wrote:
> > struct likeliness {
> > char *file;
> > int line;
> > atomic_t true_count;
> > atomic_t false_count;
> > struct likeliness *next;
> > };
>
> It seems including atomic.h inside compiler.h is a bit tricky (might have interdependency).
>
> Can we just live with int instead of atomic_t? We don't really care about losing a count occasionally..

It's nice so you don't have to fool around with locking .. The atomic_t
structure is pretty simple thought . I think it boils down to just an
int anyway .

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-22 01:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans