![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:20:50PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote: > > > It would be interesting to know which assertion failed. I guess it > > might be a zone alignment problem -- it would be interesting to turn > > the 2 HOLES_IN_ZONE tests into BUG_ONs, and enable them (ie. move them > > out of HOLES_IN_ZONE). > > ok, i added a couple of printks (see the patch below), and got this: > > zone c1f0a600 (HighMem): > pfn: 00037d00 > zone->zone_start_pfn: 00037e00 > zone->spanned_pages: 00007e00 > zone->zone_start_pfn + zone->spanned_pages: 0003fc00 > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:524! > > so the pfn is 1MB below the zone's start address - not good. You can > find the full bootup log at: The zones are 2MB aligned, discontig.c seems to do this. They should be 4MB aligned so the page allocator's assumption that zones are contiguous to MAX_ORDER is satisfied. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-21 11:53 [W:0.792 / U:0.320 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||