![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:50:32PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: > any access control scheme to be implemented? I've seen complaints > before on either here or the LSM list that one of the hurdles for > "legitimacy" was whether or not it fit on top of the current set of > LSM hooks. I also saw it asked whether or not LSM had been > designed ... and the answer is obviously "no". AFAICS, that was a way to get around Linus' "at least decide on a common set of core kernel modifications" without any kind of thinking being involved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-20 23:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||