Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:16:08 -0500 | From | "Serge E. Hallyn" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 11/11] security: AppArmor - Export namespace semaphore |
| |
Quoting Tony Jones (tonyj@suse.de): > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 08:21:28AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > Tony, do you have any performance measurements? Both for unconfined and > > confined apps? Presumably unconfined processes should have 0 performance > > hit, right? > > Hi Serge. > > We have lmbench results. We had issues getting reproducability out of dbench > but need to look at it some more. The lmbench figures we presently have are > from the old code (reader writer lock). Results were good but we recently > converted to rcu for the reader dominated rw locks. > > I'm not sure there is "0 performance hit for unconfined" as you have to check > for them being unconfined :) but it's low. > > If you have other benchmarks we are open to suggestions. What has been used > to benchmark SELinux?
I typically use dbench, reaim, tbench, and kernbench, running each 20 times.
> Anyways, we need to regenerate the results, we'll try and post in the next > couple days. ok?
Cool, thanks.
-serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |