lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
    Quoting grundig (grundig@teleline.es):
    > El Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:32:30 -0700,
    > Crispin Cowan <crispin@novell.com> escribi?:
    >
    > > Our controls on changing the name space have rather poor granularity at
    > > the moment. We hope to improve that over time, and especially if LSM
    > > evolves to permit it. This is ok, because as Andi pointed out, there are
    > > currently few applications using name spaces, so we have time to improve
    > > the granularity.
    >
    > Wouldn't have more sense to improve it and then submit it instead of the
    > contrary? At least is the rule which AFAIK is applied to every feature
    > going in the kernel, specially when there's an available alternative
    > which users can use meanwhile (see reiser4...)

    hah, that's funny

    When people do that, they are rebuked for not submitting upstream. At
    least this way, we can have a discussion about whether the approach
    makes sense at all.

    -serge
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-04-20 15:11    [W:4.377 / U:1.100 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site