Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Apr 2006 08:09:17 -0500 | From | "Serge E. Hallyn" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview |
| |
Quoting grundig (grundig@teleline.es): > El Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:32:30 -0700, > Crispin Cowan <crispin@novell.com> escribi?: > > > Our controls on changing the name space have rather poor granularity at > > the moment. We hope to improve that over time, and especially if LSM > > evolves to permit it. This is ok, because as Andi pointed out, there are > > currently few applications using name spaces, so we have time to improve > > the granularity. > > Wouldn't have more sense to improve it and then submit it instead of the > contrary? At least is the rule which AFAIK is applied to every feature > going in the kernel, specially when there's an available alternative > which users can use meanwhile (see reiser4...)
hah, that's funny
When people do that, they are rebuked for not submitting upstream. At least this way, we can have a discussion about whether the approach makes sense at all.
-serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |