lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
FromArjan van de Ven <>
DateWed, 19 Apr 2006 22:54:30 +0200
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 13:52 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:11:54 -0700 Greg KH wrote:> > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:06:57PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > > >> > > > >> Well then, have a look at http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/> > > >> > > > >> > > >hmm on first sight that seems to be basically an extension to the
> > > >existing capability() code... rather than a 'real' LSM module. Am I
> > > >missing something here?> > > >> > > > > > (So what's the definition for a "real" LSM module?)> > > > No idea, try submitting the patch :)> > hrm, I guess the smiley is supposed to help??> > surely someone knows that it takes to qualify as a "real"
> LSM module.  

ok for me it would be "implements it's own security_ops vector" as
criterium. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-19 22:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2008