![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 13:52 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:11:54 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:06:57PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Well then, have a look at http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/ > > > >> > > > > > > > >hmm on first sight that seems to be basically an extension to the > > > >existing capability() code... rather than a 'real' LSM module. Am I > > > >missing something here? > > > > > > > > > > (So what's the definition for a "real" LSM module?) > > > > No idea, try submitting the patch :) > > hrm, I guess the smiley is supposed to help?? > > surely someone knows that it takes to qualify as a "real" > LSM module. ok for me it would be "implements it's own security_ops vector" as criterium. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-19 22:57 [W:5.788 / U:0.090 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||