lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 19 Apr 2006 13:52:07 -0700
From"Randy.Dunlap" <>
SubjectRe: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:11:54 -0700 Greg KH wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:06:57PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> Well then, have a look at http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/
> > >> 
> > >
> > >hmm on first sight that seems to be basically an extension to the
> > >existing capability() code... rather than a 'real' LSM module. Am I
> > >missing something here?
> > >
> > 
> > (So what's the definition for a "real" LSM module?)
> 
> No idea, try submitting the patch :)

hrm, I guess the smiley is supposed to help??

surely someone knows that it takes to qualify as a "real"
LSM module.  I would have expected Greg to be in that group
of people.

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-19 22:52    [from the cache]
©2003-2008