![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> writes: > Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com): >> Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> writes: >> >> > Serge, >> > >> > can we do nothing with sysctls at this moment, instead of commiting hacks? >> >> Except that we modify a static table changing the uts behaviour in >> proc_doutsstring isn't all that bad. >> >> I'm just about to start on something more comprehensive, in >> the sysctl case. > > So assuming that I take out the switch(), leaving that for a better > solution by Eric (or Dave, or whoever), > > Is it time to ask for the utsname namespace patch to be tried out > in -mm? Can we please suggest a syscall interface? Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-19 20:31 [W:1.234 / U:0.180 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||