![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Quoting Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk): > On Maw, 2006-04-18 at 09:50 -0700, Gerrit Huizenga wrote: > > or are there places where a "less than perfect, easy to use, good enough" > > security policy? I believe there is room for both based on the end > > users' needs and desires. But that is just my opinion. > > Poor security systems lead to less security than no security because it > lulls people into a false sense of security. Someone who knows their Not wanting to make any digs one way or another, but because the culture right now refuses to admit it I must point out: So does "security" which is too complicated and therefore ends up misconfigured (or disabled). The posix caps sendmail fiasco is one example. -serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-18 20:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||