Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: HEADS UP for gdth driver users | Date | Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:41:02 +0200 | From | "Leubner, Achim" <> |
| |
Hi all,
The patch looks good for 2.6.17-rc1. Christoph, did you already make the second patch for the real switchover? Will only the scsi_allocate_request()/scsi_do_req()/scsi_release_request() be removed in the next kernel releases? - I'm wondering if I could use the scsi_get_command()/scsi_put_command() functions to get a Scsi_Cmnd struct. and to send it to the gdth_queuecommand()/gdth_next(). I'm willing to make and test the second patch but please give me some hints what functions you plan to kill and what function we can still use.
Thanks & Regards, Achim
======================= Achim Leubner Software Engineer / RAID drivers ICP vortex GmbH / Adaptec Inc. Phone: +49-351-8718291
-----Original Message----- From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@lst.de] Sent: Mittwoch, 8. März 2006 14:20 To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Leubner, Achim Subject: HEADS UP for gdth driver users
Hi folks,
the gdth driver is the only driver using (and in this case abusing) the scsi_request interface we plan to kill for 2.6.17. I've sent a patch that's a first step to convert the driver away from it a few weeks ago but didn't get any response. I urgently need testers to keep the driver for 2.6.17+. Else it'll be marked broken until we get a person to help testing the changes needed to resurrect it.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |