lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: HEADS UP for gdth driver users
Date
From
Hi all,

The patch looks good for 2.6.17-rc1. Christoph, did you already make the second patch for the real switchover?
Will only the scsi_allocate_request()/scsi_do_req()/scsi_release_request() be removed in the next kernel releases? - I'm wondering if I could use the scsi_get_command()/scsi_put_command() functions to get a Scsi_Cmnd struct. and to send it to the gdth_queuecommand()/gdth_next(). I'm willing to make and test the second patch but please give me some hints what functions you plan to kill and what function we can still use.

Thanks & Regards,
Achim

=======================
Achim Leubner
Software Engineer / RAID drivers
ICP vortex GmbH / Adaptec Inc.
Phone: +49-351-8718291


-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@lst.de]
Sent: Mittwoch, 8. März 2006 14:20
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Leubner, Achim
Subject: HEADS UP for gdth driver users

Hi folks,

the gdth driver is the only driver using (and in this case abusing) the
scsi_request interface we plan to kill for 2.6.17. I've sent a patch
that's a first step to convert the driver away from it a few weeks ago
but didn't get any response. I urgently need testers to keep the driver
for 2.6.17+. Else it'll be marked broken until we get a person to help
testing the changes needed to resurrect it.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-18 16:43    [W:7.401 / U:0.684 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site