Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Tue, 18 Apr 2006 07:25:29 -0700 | From | Daniel Walker <> | Subject | [PATCH -rt] Remove double history |
| |
Assuming you don't want it in there twice .
Signed-Off-By: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Index: linux-2.6.16/kernel/rt.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.16.orig/kernel/rt.c +++ linux-2.6.16/kernel/rt.c @@ -19,17 +19,6 @@ * This code is a from-scratch implementation and is not based on pmutexes, * but the idea of converting spinlocks to mutexes is used here too. * - * historic credit for proving that Linux spinlocks can be implemented via - * RT-aware mutexes goes to many people: The Pmutex project (Dirk Grambow - * and others) who prototyped it on 2.4 and did lots of comparative - * research and analysis; TimeSys, for proving that you can implement a - * fully preemptible kernel via the use of IRQ threading and mutexes; - * Bill Huey for persuasively arguing on lkml that the mutex model is the - * right one; and to MontaVista, who ported pmutexes to 2.6. - * - * This code is a from-scratch implementation and is not based on pmutexes, - * but the idea of converting spinlocks to mutexes is used here too. - * * lock debugging, locking tree, deadlock detection: * * Copyright (C) 2004, LynuxWorks, Inc., Igor Manyilov, Bill Huey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |