lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH -rt] Remove double history
	Assuming you don't want it in there twice .

Signed-Off-By: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>

Index: linux-2.6.16/kernel/rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.16.orig/kernel/rt.c
+++ linux-2.6.16/kernel/rt.c
@@ -19,17 +19,6 @@
* This code is a from-scratch implementation and is not based on pmutexes,
* but the idea of converting spinlocks to mutexes is used here too.
*
- * historic credit for proving that Linux spinlocks can be implemented via
- * RT-aware mutexes goes to many people: The Pmutex project (Dirk Grambow
- * and others) who prototyped it on 2.4 and did lots of comparative
- * research and analysis; TimeSys, for proving that you can implement a
- * fully preemptible kernel via the use of IRQ threading and mutexes;
- * Bill Huey for persuasively arguing on lkml that the mutex model is the
- * right one; and to MontaVista, who ported pmutexes to 2.6.
- *
- * This code is a from-scratch implementation and is not based on pmutexes,
- * but the idea of converting spinlocks to mutexes is used here too.
- *
* lock debugging, locking tree, deadlock detection:
*
* Copyright (C) 2004, LynuxWorks, Inc., Igor Manyilov, Bill Huey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-18 16:28    [W:0.032 / U:0.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site