![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, Nick Piggin wrote: > If I'm following you correctly, this adds another dependent load > to a per-CPU data access, and from memory that isn't node-affine. I am also concerned about that. Kiran has a patch to avoid allocpercpu having to go through one level of indirection that I guess would no longer work with this scheme. > If so, I think people with SMP and NUMA kernels would care more > about performance and scalability than the few k of memory this > saves. Right. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-17 18:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||