Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:26:14 -0700 (PDT) | From | Casey Schaufler <> | Subject | Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks) |
| |
--- Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> You can implement a BSD securelevel model in SELinux > as far as I can see > from looking at it,
Well, to seriously mangle quotes, you can implement any policy you want with SELinux, so long as Tresys puts it in.
> and do it better than the code today, so its not > really a feature drop anyway just a migration away > from some fossils
Dagnabbit, my scales are showing again.
And y'all are right, In tree users of LSM are a might thin. Sounds as if those who would use it need to push to get their code accepted really hard. That means getting past the inevitable arguement that "you can do it with SELinux".
Casey Schaufler casey@schaufler-ca.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |