lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)


    --- Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

    > You can implement a BSD securelevel model in SELinux
    > as far as I can see
    > from looking at it,

    Well, to seriously mangle quotes,
    you can implement any policy you want
    with SELinux, so long as Tresys puts
    it in.

    > and do it better than the code today, so its not
    > really a feature drop anyway just a migration away
    > from some fossils

    Dagnabbit, my scales are showing again.

    And y'all are right, In tree users of LSM
    are a might thin. Sounds as if those who
    would use it need to push to get their code
    accepted really hard. That means getting
    past the inevitable arguement that "you can
    do it with SELinux".


    Casey Schaufler
    casey@schaufler-ca.com
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-04-18 01:29    [W:3.495 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site