Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Use atomic ops for file_nr accounting, not spinlock+irq | From | Trond Myklebust <> | Date | Wed, 12 Apr 2006 23:38:03 -0400 |
| |
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 19:19 +0100, David Howells wrote: > Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> wrote: > > > I've been updating the NFS git tree on a daily basis. I'm not going to > > begin pulling from the -mm tree, though. > > The thing to which I refer is in Linus's tree but wasn't in yours this > morning. Unfortunately, this means my patch has to be different, depending on > whose tree I'm using... although your tree has been updated since then, so the > difference seems to have gone away. > > I don't mean to be critical of your efforts, but the requirement imposed by > Andrew that I have to base my tree on yours makes things a little tricky > sometimes:-/
You can always pull from Linus too. There is nothing within git that forces you to wait for me to pull in his changes.
Cheers, Trond
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |