![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:57:12AM +1000, Peter Williams wrote: > Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > > Can you give an example scenario where this patch helps? And doesn't > > the normal imabalance calculations capture those issues? > > Yes, I think that the normal imbalance calculations (in > find_busiest_queue()) will generally capture the aim of having > approximately equal average loads per task on run queues. But this bit > of code is a special case in that the extra aggression being taken by > the load balancer (in response to a scenario raised by you) is being Can you give a specific example which shows the problem and which you are trying to fix with this particular patch.. thanks, suresh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-11 05:50 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||