lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 11 Apr 2006 12:57:10 +0400
FromMichael Tokarev <>
SubjectRe: Separate Initramfs dependency on initrd (and therefore ramdisks)
Kris Shannon wrote:
> A number of distributions (most importantly for me - Debian) use the
> initrd as initramfs facility.  I assumed that the passing of the data
> block would be independent of ram disks seeing as not using a ram
> disk was one of the major reasons for initramfs,  but it seems that
> you need CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y which depends on
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y
> 
> Would a patch separating out the init image handling from the initrd
> handling be welcome and if so should the resulting init image code
> be dependant on a CONFIG variable or always on (like initramfs is now)
> 
> The only reference to this I found in the archives was:
> 
> http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0508.1/0097.html

http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0603.1/0969.html

/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-11 08:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2008