![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 04:45:32PM +1000, Peter Williams wrote: >> Problem: >> >> The current implementation of find_busiest_group() recognizes that >> approximately equal average loads per task for each group/queue are >> desirable (e.g. this condition will increase the probability that the >> top N highest priority tasks on an N CPU system will be on different >> CPUs) by being slightly more aggressive when *imbalance is small but the >> average load per task in "busiest" group is more than that in "this" >> group. Unfortunately, the amount moved from "busiest" to "this" is too >> small to reduce the average load per task on "busiest" (at best there >> will be no change and at worst it will get bigger). > > Peter, We don't need to reduce the average load per task on "busiest" > always. By moving a "busiest_load_per_task", we will increase the > average load per task of lesser busy cpu (there by trying to achieve > the equality with busiest...) Well, first off, we don't always move busiest_load_per_task we move UP TO busiest_load_per_task so there is no way you can make definitive statements about what will happen to the value "this_load_per_task" as a result of setting *imbalance to busiest_load_per_task. Load balancing is a probabilistic endeavour and we need to take steps that increase the probability that we get the desired result. Without this patch there is no chance that busiest_load_per_task will get smaller and whether this_load_per_task will get bigger is indeterminate. With this patch there IS a chance that busiest_load_per_task will decrease and an INCREASED chance that this_load_per_task will get bigger. Ergo we have increased the probability that the (absolute) difference between this_load_per_task and busiest_load_per_task will decrease. This is a desirable outcome. Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-04-11 23:49 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||