Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:49:44 -0700 (PDT) | From | Ramakanth Gunuganti <> | Subject | Re: GPL issues |
| |
Thanks for the replies, talking to a lawyer seems to be too stringent a requirement to even evaluate Linux. Who would be the ultimate authority to give definitive answers to these questions?
Since it's the Linux kernel that's under GPLv2, any work done here should be released under GPLv2. That part seems to be clear, however any product would include other things that could be proprietary. If Linux kernel is made part of this proprietary package, how does the distribution work. Can we just claim that part of the package is under GPL and only release the source code for the kernel portions.
-Ram
--- Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com> wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2006, at 02:31:27, Ramakanth Gunuganti > wrote: > > I am trying to understand the GPL boundaries for > Linux, any > > clarification provided on the following issues > below would be great: > > [...] > > Anyone trying to build a new application to work > on Linux must have > > these issues clarified, if you can share your > experiences that > > would be great too. > > If you're planning to make money off of any code > developed based in > part off of the Linux Kernel, you should definitely > contact a lawyer > familiar with the linux kernel and ask them. Any > advice you get from > this list should probably come prefixed with > "IANAL", and as such > isn't worth terribly much. > > Cheers, > Kyle Moffett > >
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |