lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 10 Mar 2006 15:55:37 +1100
FromNick Piggin <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/03] Unmapped: Separate unmapped and mapped pages
Magnus Damm wrote:
> Unmapped patches - Use two LRU:s per zone.
> 
> These patches break out the per-zone LRU into two separate LRU:s - one for
> mapped pages and one for unmapped pages. The patches also introduce guarantee 
> support, which allows the user to set how many percent of all pages per node
> that should be kept in memory for mapped or unmapped pages. This guarantee 
> makes it possible to adjust the VM behaviour depending on the workload.
> 
> Reasons behind the LRU separation:
> 
> - Avoid unnecessary page scanning.
>   The current VM implementation rotates mapped pages on the active list
>   until the number of mapped pages are high enough to start unmap and page out.
>   By using two LRU:s we can avoid this scanning and shrink/rotate unmapped 
>   pages only, not touching mapped pages until the threshold is reached.
> 
> - Make it possible to adjust the VM behaviour.
>   In some cases the user might want to guarantee that a certain amount of 
>   pages should be kept in memory, overriding the standard behaviour. Separating
>   pages into mapped and unmapped LRU:s allows guarantee with low overhead.
> 
> I've performed many tests on a Dual PIII machine while varying the amount of
> RAM available. Kernel compiles on a 64MB configuration gets a small speedup, 
> but the impact on other configurations and workloads seems to be unaffected.
> 
> Apply on top of 2.6.16-rc5.
> 
> Comments?
> 

I did something similar a while back which I called split active lists.
I think it is a good idea in general and I did see fairly large speedups
with heavy swapping kbuilds, but nobody else seemed to want it :P

So you split the inactive list as well - that's going to be a bit of
change in behaviour and I'm not sure whether you gain anything.

I don't think PageMapped is a very good name for the flag.

I test mapped lazily. Much better way to go IMO.

I had further patches that got rid of reclaim_mapped completely while
I was there. It is based on crazy metrics that basically completely
change meaning if there are changes in the memory configuration of
the system, or small changes in reclaim algorithms.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-10 04:58    [from the cache]
©2003-2008