Messages in this thread | | | From | (Bernd Eckenfels) | Subject | Re: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance | Date | Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:14:08 +0100 |
| |
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com> wrote: > Your hash sizes are still ridiculously large.
How long are those entries in the buckets kept? I mean if I untar a tree the files are only locked while extracted, afterwards they are owner-less... (I must admint I dont understand ocfs2 very deeply, but maybe explaining why so many active locks need to be cached might help to find an optimized way.
> By the way, an interesting thing happened when I recently switched disk > arrays - the fluctuations in untar times disappeared. The new array is much > nicer, while the old one was basically Just A Bunch Of Disks. Also, sync > times dropped dramatically.
Writeback Cache?
Gruss Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |