Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:29:34 -0800 (PST) | Subject | Re: {get|set}sockopt compat layer | From | "David S. Miller" <> |
| |
From: Dmitry Mishin <dim@openvz.org> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 13:23:59 +0300
> Hello, Arnd! > > > For the compat_ioctl stuff, we don't have the function pointer inside an > > #ifdef, the overhead is relatively small since there is only one of these > > structures per module implementing a protocol, but it avoids having to > > rebuild everything when changing CONFIG_COMPAT. > > > > It's probably not a big issue either way, maybe davem has a stronger > > opinion on it either way. > > > Done.
I think this looks fine but it doesn't apply cleanly to the current net-2.6.17 tree.
Could you cook up a fresh patch, and send it with a complete changelog entry and appropriate Signed-off-by: lines?
Thanks a lot Dmitry. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |