lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers.
    On 3/9/06, Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
    >
    > That is correct, the final decision is up to a Judge, but we aren't in
    > court here, we're discussing it, and so I'm making an argument that I
    > believe any sane judge would side with.
    >
    <snip>
    >
    > A "derivative work" is a work based upon one or more preexisting works,
    > such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization,
    > fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art
    > reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a
    > work may be recast, transformed, or adapted. A work consisting of
    > editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications,
    > which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a
    > "derivative work".
    >
    > No mention of either of your two conditions.

    A "work based on one or more preexisting works [in] any other form in
    which a work may be recast, transformed or adapted" sure sounds like
    it fits someone compiling software with my symbols in it to me.
    Elaboration sure sounds like it fits program code calling my program
    code to me.

    > You _might_ be able to
    > argue that they use your headers to compile their driver, so that
    > violates your copyright, but they are free to develop their own
    > compatible headers to produce compatible binaries which are in no way
    > derived from the Linux kernel. See Wine's win32 compatible headers and
    > libraries for examples of this.

    I'm sorry, I don't think that analysis is correct for software, see
    for example: http://community.linux.com/article.pl?sid=02/11/13/117247&tid=87&tid=41&tid=12&tid=42,
    and Linus' previous explanations as I pointed out in my reply to
    Xavier.

    At any rate, at the moment I'm getting paid software, not for legal
    analysis which I'm not qualified to give. I'm certainly not getting
    paid enough to sue anyone, so unless some other kernel hacker or
    company is planning on initiating a lawsuit (to which I'd happily
    join) it's fairly moot, and I'll let it drop at that.

    ciao,
    Dave
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-09 22:33    [W:4.756 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site