Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Mar 2006 22:15:02 +0100 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 18 of 20] ipath - kbuild infrastructure |
| |
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 11:00:07AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > Sam> Eventually - yes. But not just now. Kbuild was introduced > Sam> because it was needed in the top-level directory and it made > Sam> good sense to do so. But for now keeping Makefile is a good > Sam> choice. This is anyway what people are used to. > > OK, disregard my suggestion then. Should we patch > Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt to correct the current > documentation, which says: > > The preferred name for the kbuild files is 'Kbuild' but 'Makefile' > will continue to be supported. All new developmen is expected to use > the Kbuild filename. > Yes - I will do so. Thanks.
Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |