lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: filldir[64] oddness
From
Date
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 12:07 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:

> > About half of the ~50 reports I've looked at so far in their database
> > have been false positives. In most of those cases, it's not obvious how
> > a checker might have gotten them right instead, though.
>
> It seems to stumble quite a bit when faced with things that are
> free'd when refcounts drop to zero. (skbs, and kobjects).

Yes, or (in my case) stuff like "when this variable has value X, that
pointer can't possibly be NULL".

<b

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-09 18:17    [W:0.050 / U:0.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site