Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: filldir[64] oddness | From | Bryan O'Sullivan <> | Date | Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:15:14 -0800 |
| |
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 12:07 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > About half of the ~50 reports I've looked at so far in their database > > have been false positives. In most of those cases, it's not obvious how > > a checker might have gotten them right instead, though. > > It seems to stumble quite a bit when faced with things that are > free'd when refcounts drop to zero. (skbs, and kobjects).
Yes, or (in my case) stuff like "when this variable has value X, that pointer can't possibly be NULL".
<b
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |