![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Dipankar Sarma wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:00:30PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: >> From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> >> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:53:14 +1100 >> >>> The other thing that is typically done for regressions like these >>> close to release time is to revert the offending changes. I figure >>> that in this case, such an option is probably _more_ risky. >> Especially since we're talking about something that went into >> 2.6.14 > > Without a doubt, yes. Waaaay more risky. Compared to that the > rcu-batch-tuning and fix-file-counting are a cakewalk. It would > however be nice if Christoph or Viro gives the file counting > patch a look-over just so that I didn't break any sysctl > stuff. > > Thanks > Dipankar Considering the impact of the problem, wouldn't be wise to push the fix to -stable as well? Thanks Fabio -- I'm going to make him an offer he can't refuse. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-07 08:58 [W:0.031 / U:0.180 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||